THE ROSE K KERATOCONUS LENS

By Mr. Paul Rose

Hamilton, New Zealand

A retrospective analysis was made of 300 rigid contact lenses fitted in my practice to patients with keratoconus, considering in particular, base curve, back optic diameter, edge lift, sagital height, and their relationship. By computer analysis of this data a lens set was designed based on these findings. The New Zealand manufacturer of the lens was the Corneal Lens Corporation NZ Limited.

INTRODUCTION

Antonio Bassett traveled the world over 20 years ago studied and fitted some 2,700 cases of keratoconus in Asia, Africa, Europe and India. He was amazed to see that even in quite advanced cones the lack of scar tissue present, and realized contact lenses, not keratoconus, caused scarring of the cornea at the cone apex.

Having specialized in keratoconus over the last 10 years I was being referred patients who were wearing extremely ill fitting lenses which were causing irreversible corneal scar tissue and therefore permanent loss of vision. However, because of these patients' lowered corneal sensitivity they were often without symptoms. There were several keratoconus fitting sets available and some fitted well over a limited base curve range. However, the practitioner who only fitted a few cases a year was poorly equipped to know which set should be used on which cases. I, therefore, decided to attempt to design a keratoconus set which was useful over all stages of the disease and could be easily used by any contact lens practitioner who fitted rigid lenses.

To achieve this I set the following conditions for the set:

  1. It had to be "user friendly".

  2. It had to be comprehensive covering the majority of base curve ranges ever used.

  3. The overall diameter must be flexible.

  4. The design had to be very accurately reproducible.

  5. The trial lens had to be as close as possible to diameter, power thickness, and weight in the final lens.

  6. Tear exchange underneath the lens must be maximized.

To satisfy these conditions for the fitting set, computer analysis of previous fitting showed:

  1. The overall diameter would be set at 8.7 mm.


  2. The center thickness would be 0.16 or minimal.


  3. The back optic zone would decrease as the base curve steepened.

    basecurve.bmp (469798 bytes)

  4. The back optic zone would vary with diameter.


  5. The secondary curve width would vary with diameter.


  6. The axial edge lift would increase as the base curve steepened and three lifts would be set - standard, increased and decreased.


  7. The power would increase as the base curve steepened.


  8. The lens material would be gas permeable.


  9. Front surface lenticulations would be used in some bases to keep the weight and thickness to a minimum.


  10. All back curves would be well blended to produce a nearly continuously changing curve outside of the back optic zone.


COMMENTS

  1. Overall Diameter:

    If the lens fitted is not 8.7 mm then as diameter is increased or decreased, back optic zone and secondary curve widths are also increased or decreased in a fixed ratio to produce a similar fitting pattern with fluorescein on the eye.

  2. Back Optic Zone:

    To keep pooling at the base of the cone to a minimum, this must decrease as base curve steepens.

    fig2.bmp (63034 bytes)

    To explain why this is necessary: in early keratoconus a large back optic zone can be used and it only produces a shallow acceptable tear pool at the base of the cone. However, if a large back optic zone is used on an advanced cone a deep unacceptable pool is created at the base of the cone,

    fig3.bmp (64126 bytes)

    which traps tears causing anoxia and subsequent corneal edema resulting in epithelial loss at the cone apex, discomfort and poorer acuity.

    If however, a small optic zone is used on the same advanced cornea, the pooling is significantly reduced.

    The back optic zone has been set at a maximum to provide the largest optic area "allowable" at any specific base. In existing sets a small optic zone was set over their entire base curve range, therefore penalizing patients with early keratoconus by providing inferior vision.

    By maximizing the optic zone this provides maximum good stable vision to any base. However, this does cause a shallow pool at the cone base which in my experience is acceptable in most instances and does not compromise the corneal integrity.

    If, however, in some cases where the cone is small and steep, a deeper than acceptable pool is created, then by reducing the overall diameter of the lens the optic zone automatically decreases, hence reducing the pooling.

  3. Edge Lift:

    Optimum edge lift produces a fluorescein ring under the edge 0.5 to 0.7 mm wide. Standard lift will fit 70% of Rose K lens fittings. If, however, edge lift is inadequate (in approximately 20% of the time), then increased edge lift must be used. This lens will then have secondary curves 1.0 mm flatter than the standard lift. Because this reduces the effective sag of the lens, the base curve is steepened and the power increased to compensate for this loss. The lab automatically makes these calculations.

    If edge lift is excessive(approximately 10% of the time), then decreased lift must be used. This lens will have secondary curves 0.5 mm steeper than the standard lift lens. Again, the lab will calculate changes in sag and power to compensate for the effective sag increase.

  4. Astigmatism:

    Keratometer readings are of little value in assessing whether a keratoconic cornea will require a toric back surface as a large cylinder measured by the keratometer (central 3 mm ) may not extend outside of the cone. The only method of evaluation is by fluorescein pattern.

    If in the horizontal meridian the edge lift is barely adequate, but in the vertical meridian edge lift is excessive, then you may try:

    1.  
      1. Reducing the overall diameter of the lens which reduces the sag difference in the two meridians, consequently reducing the lift vertically, so a more spherical fluorescein edge pattern is obtained. This option is not always able to be used, particularly in large eyes with large pupils.

      2. Ordering the lens with a toric periphery. The standard toric periphery recommended is set a 0.8 mm difference in the two meridians.

      3. Order a full back surface toric - the standard lens set can be used to evaluate this. Simply fit using the standard set and determine the fit. The required toric lens would be equally flatter and steeper than this lens in the two meridians to give the toricity required. An 0.6 difference is adequate in most instances.

                      e.g.:  Best fit - 7.0
                             Toric lens required  7.3/6.7

      To determine the power required, use a standard lens of the flattest meridian (i.e., 7.3 in the above example).

SUMMARY

The Rose K Lens has been specifically designed to be easy to fit. It offers a choice of three different secondary curve combinations producing three different edge lifts. The design can be made in a spherical back surface, a full back surface toric, or a toric periphery only.

It is manufactured in quality materials and in any overall diameter, but the relationship of the back optic zone to the base curve and overall diameter is fixed. The lens is designed to produce good tear exchange underneath the lens, to keep overall thickness minimal and to maximize the optic area for any base curve.



The Rose K Lens


 

Lens design by : Mr Paul Rose, Optometrist.

Lens manufacturer : Corneal Lens Corporation N.Z. Ltd.


The Rose Keratoconus lens uses a decreasing BCOD as the base curve steepens. The ratio is set but is dependent on base curve and diameter. However there are three degrees of edge lift that can be ordered - standard, increased and decreased.

Because this lens design follows more closely the corneal shape, the Rose K lens provides excellent vision and comfort. The power of the trial set increases as the base steepens, allowing more accurate power assessment.



The Rose K Set


 

Base curve : 5.3 to 7.8 (LARGE) 5.8 to 7.6 (SMALL)
Power : Any
Centre thickness : Minimum
Lens material : A choice of quality materials.
Edge lift : Standard, increased or decreased.

For more details in the UK contact:

 

NOVA CONTACT LENSES
Unit 11 Avebury Court,
Mark Road
Hemel Hempstead,
Herts
HP2 7TA
ENGLAND
Tel:- 44 (0)1442-253456
Fax:- 44 (0)1442-253301

Email:- nova-cl@dircon.co.uk

Web:- novacontactlenses.com